« Things worth reading: 20th July 2010 | Main | Things worth reading: 21st July 2010 »

July 20, 2010

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a01053620481c970b0134858ef215970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The first Metro Bank marketing brochure [UPDATE]:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Jeffry Pilcher | TheFinancialBrand.com

This brochure is ugly and overloaded with way too much copy.

I like the concept and strategy behind Metro Bank, but its overall brand image leaves much to be desired.

martin campbell

Jeffrey - oh come on! There is something MUCH bigger at play here than brochure design! It could be printed on recycled newspaper and it would still be significant, welcome and promising. WAY too much of banking in the UK has been all about superslick Marketing hogwash, all hiding awful service, rip off products and corporate cultures that dribble greed. I wish Metro Bank all the success in the world - and desperately hope the other newcomers spend more time getting the proposition right and putting the consumer first for the first time, rather than producing 'the perfect brochure'!

Martin Campbell

Tudor

I sit firmly in the Jeffrey camp on this one. I agree that Metro have an opportunity to change the approach to banking , but have missed it with this communications approach. For a bank that wants and needs to have broad appeal, my thought is that this reaches a very narrow demographic.

Tudor

Affable

My take on Metrobank: customer-centric proposition but a cheesy brochure, they’ll get it right - and the next time I’m p***ed off with my bank…

Richard Ireland

I'm loving it. And if you stop to remember that the *brochure* is actually meant to be read in the hand, not on the screen, then it probably works (depending on paper stock and finish of course!). As an online ad it doesn't work, but that's not what it was made for.

@martin campbell: agree entirely that this is much more than a brochure. Brand is more than a logo and a colour, and what they are saying is certainly taking on the weaknesses of the incumbents. If they deliver against it all, it will certainly do more than raise a few eyebrows.

Sadly I suspect the press will punish them. With this level of service, it is unlikely the products themselves will be "best", under the traditional price-flavoured microscope. It is imperative that they introduce *service* as a valuable commodity.

Unfortunately @Affable's take on it is likely to hold back customer growth - despite the inevitability of being p****ed off by your bank sometime soon, most of us won't pre-empt that by changing providers.

I think though I might go to holborn branch next friday

Jeffry Pilcher | The Financial Brand

I'll restate/rephrase my comment... I did not say Metro Bank needs "a super slick image," nor did I say/suggest that "brand image is everything." Again, I am very enthusiastic about the Metro Bank concept. I think their brand strategy is spot on.

However, I challenge anyone here to explain how/why Metro Bank's current brand image is on-strategy. How does the use of type, color, copy/message, tone, style and imagery complement, support and reflect the bank's brand strategy? Why does the logo have a slash through the M? Why was a clunky slab face sans-serif chosen as the primary typeface? What significance does the all red-white-and-blue color scheme have?

Design isn't an afterthought. It shouldn't be an accidental process, nor should it be influenced by one's personal likes/dislikes. There are literally hundreds of decisions a design team must make when crafting a brand image. I struggle to see the synaptic connections between the image and the strategy. To me, it looks like design decisions were made arbitrarily, and with little regard/connection to the strategy.

And Martin, while you may disagree with my perspective, I'm not sure how this kind of comment is helpful or necessary:
http://twitter.com/martincampbell/status/19060452674

I very much grasp that there is something "much bigger at play here" than just a brochure. Indeed, that is precisely my point. When it comes to brands, the message and the manner in which it is delivered are equally important. Once can't dismiss the importance of a brand's identity simply because you're enraptured with the message.

Chris Skinner

I agree with you to an extent Jeffry ... although take a look at Anthony Thomson (Metro Chair's) background.

Anthony co-founded City Financial Marketing in 1987, which became Europe’s largest financial marketing consulting and communications group before being sold to Publicis in 1997. After this, he created the highly successful Financial Services Forum, the largest membership group I know that is dedicated to the financial services marketing community.

Anthony's a career Marketing guy by background so the branding brashness is a bit of a surprise.

The blue and red looks a bit dated to me and I would have expected something far more Apple-ish, e.g. cool, for Metro Bank.

Instead, from a branding viewpoint, we have Wal*Mart rather than Apple.

Now Wal*Mart is successful, and so maybe Metro wants to be a blue-collar bank champion rather than a 21st century aspirational brand.

Either way, I think the branding has some challenges as you have pointed out and we'll see how the appeal plays out.

Whatever happens, it's nice to see that they're doing something different, as per Matthew's comments.

Chris

Martin Campbell

Martin Campbell back to say thanks for the Twitter plug Jeffrey - http://twitter.com/martincampbell/status/19060452674.

Perhaps laughable was not the right word. "Tragic" - yes, that's better - certainly more accurate.

The banking sector has just taken the UK closer to total economic meltdown than terrorists with a dirty bomb on Old Broad Street, and yet when the first new competitor arrives on the high street since flint knives were in vogue, promising a cure to many of the ills that really matter to real people, some designer in an ivory tower knocks them for - gulp - "questionable design" on a brochure reproduced in an environment it was never intended for.

Yup. Not laughable. Definately tragic.

This debate is happening in the equivalent of the Westminster Village. However, if 100 people were pulled in off the street to join us and asked what mattered to them from a new bank - they would NOT say the design of the brochure - or even the trillion pound advertising campaign (take a bow Lloyds).

They WOULD say the quality of the service, the value for money, the degree to which they help customers manage their money better and the extent to which they can be trusted to be trying hard to do a good job for their customers.

It's not rocket science. It might not even be laughable. But it certainly is tragic that when the Banking Village looks at the first new entrant in the UK since the Ice Age, some industry folk disappear up their self-serving obsessions, leaving the paying customer as high, dry and badly served as they have been for decades.

In fewer words - the quality of products, service and brand values (extent to which customers' interests balanced with shareholders/staff/management's) is what really matters. The brochure is - at best - a superficial wrapper. Worst of all, it, and other Marketing promotion techniques (advertising, DM, etc), share the blame for much of how the consumer has been lulled into putting up with such utterly appalling treatment by the banking industry for so long.

See you on Twitter,

MC

Jeffry Pilcher | TheFinancialBrand.com

Martin, I have no interest nor anything to gain by engaging with someone who uses put-downs, personal attacks and name-calling to make their point.

I am neither a designer nor do I live in an ivory tower. I have no self-serving interests, primarily because I offer no services to the banking sector. I am not a consultant in any form. I publish a B2B website on financial branding. That's my job, nothing else. No hidden agenda. Sorry to disappoint, by my reflections are based on nothing but the work presented.

And that is where our conversation concludes.

James Wrighton

We're running a mini-poll on Financial Marketing UK (http://bit.ly/am3XrV) asking what level of success people feel Metro Bank will have. Early results point to 'niche player' as opposed to wider penetration. And as far as their brand design goes, personally I feel it's eager and ambitious but a touch clumsy. Their website certainly doesn't feel like that of an aspiring national bank. Good luck to them - and I look forward to seeing inside the Holborn branch.

Alex Wulms

I'm not an expert in font types or color schemes but what I do like about the brochure is that all the key messages about what makes this bank special do jump out. There is some further "small" print in the brochure to further explain the key messages but it is certainly impossible to miss them. So from my perspective, the marketing department has done a good job with this brochure in communicating what makes this new bank special and why you would want to change from your current bank to them.

Martin Campbell

Apologies to Jeffrey for causing such offence. But two further thoughts:

Firstly, The extent to which the banking industry needs to overhaul itself, re-engineer its culture and personality (the true essence of its brand, not the veneer created by the marketing dept) and start to treat its customers with something better than contempt means that it is NOT going to happen quickly or easily or without all those involved being open and frank about the realities of what goes on. Dressing things up in polite and bland business-speak only serves to hide or nearly excuse the awful behaviour and past flaws of the industry.

Secondly, a B2B website on financial branding is precisely the kind of place where, if the improvements that are needed in bank culture/brand values (the brand values they reflect in practice to their customers, not the gloss and veneer that's put up by the marketing team to hide behind) are going to happen, the true reality of the banks' past and current practices needs to be recognised and aired openly and frankly.

And just to repeat my apology to Jeffrey - I am sorry - I really didn't mean to cause personal offence. Please put my language down to the subject being something I feel very strongly about - and the two points I make above re the need to stop hiding sharp practice behind flattering and gentle business-speak and marketing gloss.

MC

Geoff Whitehouse

Interesting debate....the brochure, the copy etc is does strike me as very different to what's out there at the moment - I can't remember the last time I bothered reading banking literature that came through the post. So that in itself is branding, setting itself up as the outsider, the new kids on the block.

On a personal level I hate the constant use of blue and red. If they wanted to be seen as 'different' then a move away from the traditional colours and a typeface straight out of the early 80s might have been a good idea.

It does also strike me on first glance as a very obviously "american" approach, perhaps no surprise given the origins. That said from a pure design perspective it's still far too cluttered and stylistically a bit all over the place. In this day and age of super-slick Apple-esque shiny and clean approach that does count for something - first impressions count for much.

I'll be interested to visit a branch to see for myself how their approach translates in a physical space. I like how they're positioning the branch as a retailer and it's not even that radical but common sense: a toilet for example. Never seen one in a branch before on either side of the Atlantic, only ever in Hong Kong.

That said with no security screens should I hide the shotgun on my pet Weimaraner? Least he'd get a free biscuit ;)

MODERN1ST

the brochures and branding are very similar to what commerce bank did in the usa. their "naive" approach worked very well there and it will work even better here, given the absolute misery that is today's retail banking experience in the uk.

people don't want another slick brochure. people just want a bank that doesn't suck.

i'm opening an account at metro 29 july.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz

Twitter FSClub

    follow me on Twitter
    Gaping Void: The Finanser Blog
    Wordle: The Finanser Blog

    A-Team Group

    The Financial Brand

    Digital Money Forum

    NetBanker

    Payments News - from Glenbrook Partners

    Analytics